WGAG/No Westbury Incinerator Group response to Wiltshire Council

30 Nov 2020
No to Westbury Incinerator

 

THE local campaign group, WGAG / No Westbury Incinerator Group, has sent a response to Wiltshire Council about the planned incinerator for Westbury, following a statement to the local media from Northacre Renewable Energy Limited.

The statement has been sent to Wiltshire councillors who are members of the strategic planning committee, who will make the decision, which was originally scheduled for today, 30th November, but is now believed to be held over to the new year.

WGAG / No Westbury Incinerator Group has made the following response:

"NREL's Project Director writes in the statement, "It is easy for misleading statements to be made by those who oppose facilities such as that proposed by Northacre Renewable Energy, regarding the performance of modern combustion technology."

"Local people who have spent years opposing NREL's multiple planning applications for different types of incineration plant are capable of understanding and assessing the technology. The performance of modern combustion technology is inefficient compared with modern gas fired and nuclear power stations, particularly as NREL offer no prospect of using the heat from the combustion process or of capturing carbon emissions.

"Up to 40% of the waste fed into the incinerator will come out as ash, some of which is classed as hazardous and has to be transported to specialised landfill.

"NREL's Project Director, Alex Young, makes many 'misleading statements' himself. He writes that moving grate combustion technology has been 'successfully and safely deployed across the UK and Europe for many years'

"On the contrary, there have been multiple breaches of environmental permits associated with incineration and 'success' is subjective. The safety of an incinerator is only as good as its operators.

"Will the incinerator be 'successfully deployed' if waste has to be driven into Westbury by HGV from across Europe to make it economically viable over the next quarter of a century?

"Is it a success if the plant contributes millions of tonnes of carbon dioxide to climate change?

"Is it a success if Westbury's air quality continues to breach the legal limit because of emissions from the incinerator and HGVs full of waste passing through its centre?

"Mr Young claims that emissions monitoring has 'become more sophisticated'.

"However, the Environment Agency has confirmed that environmental permitting does not require filtering of the smallest particulates from the gases which would be breathed by the people of Westbury."

The group says that in his letter to Wiltshire councillors, Mr Young says that technical consultees have raised no objections to the change from gasification to moving grate technology, but they refute this (full details in next week's White Horse News).

They say, "NREL's application is opposed by Westbury Town Council and more than 15 other town and parish councils. NREL have not engaged with or addressed the concerns of these stakeholders. South West Wiltshire Lib Dems tweeted

NREL response

"Since July, although over 2,000 objections have been received by Wiltshire Council's planning department. NREL, a company jointly owned by the Hills and Bioenergy Infrastructure Groups, has only held one public consultation meeting for members of the public which was online."

In considering NREL's business model, WGAG/NWI says it is questionable in the face of a potential incineration tax and the high cost of its electricity compared with nuclear, solar and wind.

They say, "The supply chains for 243,000 tonnes of waste per annum to feed its process are subject to the uncertainties of Brexit, post-Covid recession and competition with other incinerators which are already operating in the West Country."

Finally, Westbury's MP, alongside Liberal Democrats Councillors, Independent Councillors and the Lib Dem Spokesperson Ellen Nicholson, oppose NRELs application. In his objection to the planning application he writes, "Northacre is unable to deny that its application to replace gasification with incineration would be a retrograde step in respect of key parameters - the threat to health, nuisance to the public and damage to the environment."

The local MP will be chairing an online debate for MPs and their constituents on incineration on 8th December. Those who wish to attend can sign up at: https://ukwin.org.uk/policy/

The groups reponse was reported in the White Horse News and Wiltshire Times

http://www.whitehorsenews.co.uk/blog/2020/11/30/anti-incinerator-group-responds-to-nrel-statement/?fbclid=IwAR2u_IeIv2vVO2TsX9h5EbBjDAZq_xs6De6jIvG3UZ0fKmSmAmRSp1h7fIM


https://www.wiltshiretimes.co.uk/news/18907431.westbury-incinerator-protest-group-rejects-northacre-renewable-energys-misleading-statement-claims/

Earlier this month, NREL issued a statement saying it was easy for people opposing the Westbury incinerator to make misleading statements.

Marie Hillcoat, of WGAG / No Westbury Incinerator Group, rejected the accusation, saying more than 2,000 residents, 15 town and parish councils, and Westbury's local MP Dr Andrew Murrison, had all objected to the scheme.

This website uses cookies

Like most websites, this site uses cookies. Some are required to make it work, while others are used for statistical or marketing purposes. If you choose not to allow cookies some features may not be available, such as content from other websites. Please read our Cookie Policy for more information.

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
Marketing cookies are used by third parties or publishers to display personalized advertisements. They do this by tracking visitors across websites.